In terms of marine management , the crucial policy driver for the Marine and Coastal Access Act lies in Defra's policy document ‘Safeguarding our Seas: A strategy for the Conservation and Sustainable Development of our Marine Environment‟ (2002) in which a specific outcome was sought: „clean, healthy, safe, productive, and biologically diverse oceans and seas’. There are many reasons for this aspiration, not least recognition that the seas are our life-support system that has been responsible for much of the carbon sequestration that has taken place over the past billions of years. Add to that the reliance we place on the marine environment as a source of food and raw materials, it is clear in terms that the seas occupy a central place in the systems that secure our well-being.
We have failed to meet the targets set by either Gothenburg or Rio commitments. In recent years some of the finest reef features on the south coast of England have been extensively damaged in Lyme Bay by Scallop fishermen. Every winter 400 plus dead dolphins wash up south-west shores as a result of pair trawling for bass, and stocks of several commercial fish are close to collapse. Seabird colonies that are reliant upon fish are also experiencing very low reproductive success, which in turn leads to declining populations of charismatic species such as puffins. The need for the setting up of the MCZ’s becomes very apparent under these circumstances.
Unlike selection of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Areas (SPA), MCZs are being developed through a consultative process with four separate projects:
The idea of these projects is that stakeholders will influence the choice of sites. This means that at least in theory the choices will not be driven wholly by the conservation lobby and it will be possible to take account of socio-economic concerns as well.
The MCZ Project planning timetable
In England, the four Regional MCZ Projects have been asked to submit their recommendations to Natural England and JNCC by June 2011.
Providing these recommendations meet the scientific guidelines set, they will be submitted unchanged to Ministers. In the event that they do not meet the guidelines, Natural England and JNCC will also provide their advice to Ministers.
Recommendations, along with Natural England’s and JNCC’s advice, will then be submitted to Ministers, at which point the statutory stage of the designation process will commence.
On receiving recommended network options, Ministers will consider how well they meet, and are consistent with, the relevant statutory considerations, national policy objectives, the advice of the independent Science Advisory Panel, the conservation agencies, and the UK’s international commitments.
Although not bound by the recommendations of the regional projects, Ministers will attach considerable weight to them, especially where recommendations are supported by stakeholders.
Where the recommendations from the Regional MCZ Projects are accepted, Ministers will draft designation orders, and carry out formal public consultation in accordance with section 119 of the Act.
Formal public consultation is expected to take place in early 2012. Ministers will consider objections and representations received before deciding whether to make a designation order.
The Marine Conservation Society believe that new sites to be designated as Marine Conservation Zones (off England & Wales) and Marine Protected Areas (off Scotland) should be selected based on scientific criteria. Where marine flora or fauna or habitats are not rare, threatened or declining and the desirability of designating two or more areas is equal, then we accept that regard could be given to any social or economic consequences of designation as a secondary consideration, subject to the achievement of ecological coherence of the site network and the site conservation objectives as set out in the UK and Scottish Marine Bills.
Where socio-economic criteria are being considered, for example when choosing between ecologically equivalent sites, we believe that if commercial interests are to have a say in where such representative sites are located so should the public, divers and others who appreciate our seas. This will help reflect the fact that the sea is not simply a resource that is there to be exploited. Instead, it is an important natural asset to be enjoyed by all, and conservation zones and marine protected areas will be appreciated by a great many people, including our members and the general public; both in person and in just knowing they exist.
Your Seas Your Voice offers the UK public the opportunity to show they support the principle of marine reserves in our seas, will help show where sites have most public support and could also identify new sites with scientific merit that government searches might have overlooked.
Vote Now!
|
|